1. Health

Discuss in my forum

Buddy T

5 States Mandate Ignition Locks for First Offenders

By January 5, 2009

Follow me on:

New laws have gone into effect in six states that will require drivers convicted of drunk driving to install ignition interlock devices in their vehicles. As of Jan. 1, five states can now mandate the safety devices for anyone convicted for the first offense of driving while under the influence. That brings the total to eight the number of states that have first-offender interlock laws.

One state passed a new law requiring the devices for repeat offenders as of the new year.

Alaska, Colorado, Illinois, Nebraska and Washington began requiring the interlock devices for first offenders. Those states join New Mexico, Louisiana and Arizona as the only states that require the devices for first offenders.

South Carolina now requires the interlocks for repeat offenders, joining several states that make it mandatory. Many states have laws that leave the interlock requirement up to the sentencing judge.

Devices Decrease Traffic Fatalities

Mothers Against Drunk Driving, an advocacy group that has been pushing for laws in every state demanding ignition interlocks for first offenders, says that the devices are rarely ordered by judges unless the law mandates them.

That was especially true in Illinois, according to MADD.

"Illinois has excellent law enforcement," MADD national CEO Chuck Hurley said. "But the judicial system leaks like a sieve. This law will change the catch and release system to one where people are at least caught and tagged."

While lobbying for the first offender laws, MADD points to the success of the devices in New Mexico, the first state to mandate the interlocks in 2005. According to MADD, drunk-driving related deaths have dropped 20 percent.

First-Offender Laws Opposed by Some

The first-offender laws are opposed by the liquor industry. Sarah Longwell of the American Beverage Institute said her group supports use of the devices for repeat offenders or those who are arrested with excessively high blood-alcohol concnetrations.

The laws mandating the devices for first offenders does not give the judge any discretion in sentencing and could lead to more draconian laws.

"We foresee is a country in which you're no longer able to have a glass of wine, drink a beer at a ball game or enjoy a champagne toast at a wedding," Longwell told reporters. "There will be a de facto zero tolerance policy imposed on people by their cars."

More About Drunk Driving:

Photo: © Drager/Dreager
Comments
January 5, 2009 at 10:59 pm
(1) lisaf-breakingthecycles says:

Sarah Longwell’s comment, “…There will be a de facto zero tolerance policy imposed on people by their cars,” to be the exact reason this law should spread to all 50 states.

To “earn” an ignition lock, you have to have been driving while impaired by alcohol. If you get a DUI, you are driving in a manner that allows you to kill someone or seriously injure them and that is not your right. No one says you should not enjoy a beer at a ball game or a champagne toast at a wedding — the law just says you should not drive afterwards!

I wholeheartedly agree that first time offenders should be required to have mandatory ignition locks installed on their vehicles as a consequence for their decision to drive while impaired.

January 22, 2009 at 6:01 pm
(2) Illinois Interlocks says:

You can find addtional information on the new MDDP program in Illinois

July 25, 2012 at 1:11 am
(3) max says:

Stop talking about stuff you havent witnessed or know nothing about….
1st offenders who havent killed or harmed anyone shouldnt have the interlock device…. shut your pie hole lisa

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

©2014 About.com. All rights reserved.

We comply with the HONcode standard
for trustworthy health
information: verify here.